Legal Opinion
Hibma v. Odegaard
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 9, 1984No. 82-C-548-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SHABAZ, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on several motions after verdict, the most significant of which is the motion of intervening defendant Sawyer County for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. That motion is granted, while the remaining motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendants Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula are former Sawyer County deputy sheriffs who plead guilty, in 1981 and 1982, to separate federal indictments stemming from their involvement as deputies in the 1977 arrest and conviction of plaintiff George C. Hibma.
Subsequently, Hibma…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cameron v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982
- John Alan Appleman and Jean G. Appleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Harris v. County of RacineDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Schroeder v. SchoessowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George C. Hibma v. Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula, and Sawyer County, Wisconsin, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Lewis v. MeloniDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Rickey L. Stephenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- George C. Hibma v. Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula, and Sawyer County, Wisconsin, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- George C. Hibma v. Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula, and Sawyer County, Wisconsin, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985