Legal Opinion

George C. Hibma v. Richard T. Odegaard, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula, and Sawyer County, Wisconsin, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 30, 1985No. 84-1137, 84-1445Published

1Opinion of the Court

769 F.2d 1147

George C. HIBMA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Richard T. ODEGAARD, James Nikodem, and Michael Paul Szula,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

Sawyer County, Wisconsin, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 84-1137, 84-1445.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Oct. 30, 1984.

Decided July 30, 1985.

1

Eric J. Wahl, Eau Claire, Wis., for plaintiff-appellant.

2

Richard C. Niess, Madison, Wis., for defendants-appellees.

3

Before CUDAHY and COFFEY, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, Senior District Judge.*

4

GRANT, Senior District Judge.

5

Plaintiff-Appellant, Hibma, appeals the trial court's granting of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Cudahy; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Coffey.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API