Legal Opinion

State v. Mathews

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 34 opinions

JZjopeaZ from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. ' I. The act of March 10,1869 (Sess. Acts 1869, p. 45), does not relate to more than one subject, and that subject is properly expressed in the title. (City of St. Louis v. Tiefel, 42 Mo. 578 ; People v. Mahoney, 13 Mich. 495 ; Davis v. Bank of Fulton, 31 Ga. 69; McAunich v. Mississippi R.R.

Read the full summary

JZjopeaZ from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. ' I. The act of March 10,1869 (Sess. Acts 1869, p. 45), does not relate to more than one subject, and that subject is properly expressed in the title. (City of St. Louis v. Tiefel, 42 Mo. 578 ; People v. Mahoney, 13 Mich. 495 ; Davis v. Bank of Fulton, 31 Ga. 69; McAunich v. Mississippi R.R. Co., 20 Iowa, 338; Robinson v. Skipworth, 23 Ind. 311; O’Leary v. Cook, 28 Ill. 534; People v. Lawrence, 36 Barb. 177; Johnson v. Higgins, 3 Hete., Ky., 556.) II. It does not impair the obligation of a contract. (Bank of Columbia v. Attorney-General, 3…

1Opinion of the Court

Wagner, Judge,

delivered the' opinion of the court.

The defendant, who is president of the Excelsior Insurance Company, was prosecuted and convicted in the Court of Criminal Correction for a violation of the insurance laws of this State. It is agreed that the Excelsior Insurance Company is a company for insuring fire and marine risks, and was chartered by the Legislature several years prior to the passage of the general insurance law now in force, and that the act of incorporation exempted it from the operation of the statutes of 1855, subjecting corporate charters to legislative repeal,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. City of St. Louis v. TiefelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  3. Gorman v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. TiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Bank of Columbia v. Attorney GeneralCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Hammerschmidt v. Boone CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Dickason v. County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API