Legal Opinion

Karotkin Furniture Co. v. Decker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 5, 1930No. 8483PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In the absence from appellant’s brief of a sufficient statement of the case, we adopt that contained in appellee’s brief:

“This suit was originally instituted by Billy Decker, a minor, suing by and through his next friend, against' Appellant, for damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of a, truck owned, and operated by Appellant’s servants and agents running over Ap-pellee, while he was upon a public street in the city of San Antonio. .Appellee, among other things, charged that the operators of the truck failed to keep such a lookout as a person of ordinary prudence would have…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Armstrong Packing Co. v. Clem.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Handley v. LeighTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Kaker v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Karotkin Furniture Co. v. DeckerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Classen v. BenferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. HittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Sorrentino v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Page v. LockleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API