Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. Morton School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2007No. 06-35388PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed on September 20, 2007 [504 F.3d 771], is amended as follows: on slip Opinion page 12821 [504 F.3d at 775], remove lines 21 through 34, and insert the following text:
Blanchard also brings claims under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), and title II of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12132. Under those statutes, Blanchard is a proper plaintiff, at least insofar as she is asserting and enforcing the rights of her son and incurring expenses for his benefit. See Greater L.A. Council on Deafness, Inc. v. Zolin, 812 F.2d 1103, 1115 (9th Cir.1987); see also…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. AbramsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Stanek v. St. Charles Community Unit School District 303Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Mark H. Ex Rel. Michelle H. v. LemahieuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Payne Ex Rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Tablada v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.