Legal Opinion
Winkelman Ex Rel. Winkelman v. Parma City School District
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 21, 2007No. 05-983PublishedCited by 594 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
Some four years ago, Mr. and Mrs. Winkelman, parents of five children, became involved in lengthy administrative and legal proceedings. They had sought review related to concerns they had over whether their youngest child, 6-year-old Jacob, would progress well at Pleasant Valley Elementary School, which is part of the Parma City School District in Parma, Ohio.
Jacob has autism spectrum disorder and is covered by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Act or IDEA), 84 Stat. 175, as amended, 20 U. S. C. § 1400 et seq. (2000 ed. and Supp. IV). His parents worked with the school district…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by594 opinions
- Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States Ex Rel. Mergent Services v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Chambers v. School District of Philadelphia Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Elustra v. MineoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Berrios v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
589 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.