State v. Robinson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentKaren R. Baker, Justice
While I agree with the majority that we must address whether this is a proper appeal by the State as a threshold matter, I disagree with the majority’s holding on that issue. Because the issues brought on appeal by the State are not important to the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law, the matters before us do not constitute a proper State appeal. Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction, and I would dismiss the appeal.
| inThe majority holds that this case presents a proper issue for an appeal by the State because the material facts are undisputed. Thus, the majority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GrisbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Gaylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- State v. Mancia-SandovalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- State v. FusonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.