Yanez v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge.
Two questions are raised in this writ of certiorari. The first is whether the facts presented by the petitioner are sufficient to raise a presumption of an impaired earning capacity at the time of incurring a scheduled injury, so that the petitioner may receive an unscheduled award under A.R.S. § 23-1044(E). The second question is whether, absent such a presumption, there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the hearing officer’s finding that no previous disability existed.
On 3 October 1969 the petitioner was standing on top of a garbage truck in the course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ossic v. Verde Central MinesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Ronquillo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- McKinney v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Edwards v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Sutton v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Borsh v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Reddel v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.