Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York, & v. Otis W. Dyer, Jr., & Otis W. Dyer, Jr., & v. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company of New York, &

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1955No. 15065_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Presented here are cross appeals from a judgment in an action under the “Blowout” provisions of an insurance policy issued to a drilling contractor and providing coverage on an oil well drilling rig and appurtenances. The insured, Dyer, 1 brought the suit for the alleged value of equipment lost or damaged as a result of an occurrence at an oil well and for “sue and labor costs”, praying for judgment in the sum of $20,050.84, 2 plus statutory penalties and attorney’s fees. The trial judge held 3 that what occurred at the well was a “blowout” within the policy definition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Georgia Home Ins. Co. v. MeansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Dyer v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1953

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Equity Oil Company, a Corporation v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. Big Chief Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Sutton Drilling Company, Inc. v. Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Creole Explorations, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Equity Oil Co. v. National Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API