Legal Opinion
Georgia Home Ins. Co. v. Means
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1951No. 13248_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
Brought under the “blowout” provision 1 of an insurance policy, TR-2293, the suit was for loss and damage,to an oil rig and equipment.
The claim was that while plaintiff was engaged in drilling an oil well with the insured rig, a “blowout”, as that term is defined in the policy, occurred, causing loss and damage to the equipment insured under the policy to the extent of $40,483.38.
The defenses, in addition to a denial, were affirmative pleas: (1) of no blowout; as that term is defined 2 in the policy; (2) breach of clause 11 of the policy, “Impairment of Liability”; and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Equity Oil Company, a Corporation v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York, & v. Otis W. Dyer, Jr., & Otis W. Dyer, Jr., & v. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company of New York, &Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Sutton Drilling Company, Inc. v. Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Creole Explorations, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Dyer v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.