Legal Opinion
B.S. v. Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 2009No. 07-56477Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
This action was brought by the parents of B.S., an autistic child, against the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (“District”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482. The parents of B.S. requested a due process hearing asserting that: (1) the District failed in its obligations to provide him a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) during the 2004-2005 school year; (2) they were enti*399tied to reimbursement for expenses incurred in placing B.S. in a private school, and B.S. is entitled to prospective placement at that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whittaker Corporation Whittaker Controls, Inc. v. Execuair Corporation Execuair Sales Corporation David ManhanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education, El Paso Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Ms. S., for Herself and on Behalf of Her Daughter G. v. Vashon Island School District Office of Superintendent of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sacramento City Unified School District, Board of Education v. Rachel H. ex rel. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- L.M. Ex Rel. Sam M. v. Capistrano Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008