L.M. Ex Rel. Sam M. v. Capistrano Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
L.M. is the autistic child of two loving parents, Samuel and Mariette (collectively “Parents”), who have spared no expense to obtain private in-home treatment for their developmentally disabled son. The local Capistrano Unified School District (“District”) balked at the idea of continuing the in-home educational plan at public expense and offered an alternative plan. The matter ended up before an administrative law judge in California who conducted a four-day evidentiary hearing to resolve the dispute, ultimately ruling in favor of the District.
We must decide whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Drinker v. Colonial School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joshua A. Ex Rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- J.G. ex rel. Jimenez v. Baldwin Park Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- B.S. v. Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- B.S. v. Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- E.E. v. Norris School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.