Legal Opinion
Wingfield v. United Technologies Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 3, 1988No. Civ. H-84-262(MJB)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION IN LIMINE
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff, a former employee of defendant, seeks to recover damages for alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). 1 Shortly before this case was originally scheduled for trial, defendant filed a “Motion in Limine” in which defendant asked this court to (1) exclude evidence with respect to the 1977, 1979, and 1981 instances of discrimination on the grounds that those incidents are not actionable, (2) exclude evidence of “constructive discharge” in 1987 on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Robert R. Henn v. National Geographic SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Malarkey v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Blesedell v. Mobil Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Miner v. Town of CheshireDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Whittingham v. Amherst CollegeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Martini v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.