Legal Opinion

Lidow v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2012No. B239042PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*354Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

The novel question presented in this case is whether, under a conflict of laws principle known as the internal affairs doctrine, California law or foreign law applies to a claim brought by an officer of a foreign corporation for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. We hold that under the circumstances alleged here, specifically where a foreign corporation has removed or constructively discharged a corporate officer in retaliation for that person’s complaints of possible harmful or unethical activity, California law applies.

BACKGROUND

The parties do not dispute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  5. CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Colaco v. Cavotec SA, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Boschetti v. Pac. Bay Invs. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Boschetti v. Pacific Bay Investments Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Gill v. Marsh USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API