Lidow v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*354Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
The novel question presented in this case is whether, under a conflict of laws principle known as the internal affairs doctrine, California law or foreign law applies to a claim brought by an officer of a foreign corporation for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. We hold that under the circumstances alleged here, specifically where a foreign corporation has removed or constructively discharged a corporate officer in retaliation for that person’s complaints of possible harmful or unethical activity, California law applies.
BACKGROUND
The parties do not dispute…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scheenstra v. California Dairies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Colaco v. Cavotec SA, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Boschetti v. Pac. Bay Invs. Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Boschetti v. Pacific Bay Investments Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Gill v. Marsh USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.