Legal Opinion

U S West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2000No. CV-00-0022-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice,

¶ 1 We granted review in this case to determine whether we should continue to follow the rule that a party seeking to obtain relief from a judgment entered after remand from an appellate court must first apply to the appellate court for permission to pursue its motion in the trial court. We conclude that we should not continue to follow that rule and therefore overrule Rogers v. Ogg, 101 Ariz. 161, 416 P.2d 594 (1966), which held that permission is required. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Arizona Constitution article VI, section 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24 (1992).

FACT…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Price v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. Office of the Guardian ad Litem v. A.M.K.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. ClUtah Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API