Legal Opinion

Office of the Guardian ad Litem v. A.M.K.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2007No. 20060441PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 A.M.K.'s parental rights were terminated by the juvenile court. Thereafter, A.M.K. sought a new termination hearing, arguing that the failure of a planned adoption of two of her children constituted newly discovered evidence. We hold that the failed adoption does not qualify as newly discovered evidence because it is not evidence of facts in existence at the time of trial.

BACKGROUND

1 2 A.M.K. is the biological mother of three minor children, C.L., D.S., and R.S. In December 2003, the Divigion of Child and Family…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland CityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re State in Interest of JpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. In the Interest of S.R.Utah Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Del Rogers v. OggArizona Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. AcmUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. ClUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API