Legal Opinion

Laurel National Bank v. Mutual Benefit Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1982No. 612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The instant appeal comes to us as a result of an order of the lower court awarding appellant, Laurel National Bank (“Laurel Bank”), insurance coverage as mortgagee under one mortgage but denying it coverage on the same property and under the same policy under its second mortgage. Laurel Bank contends that both mortgages should be covered by the insurance policy and that the amount due under the policy should not be limited to its preforeclosure debt.

Laurel Bank filed a complaint in assumpsit against Mutual Benefit Insurance, which case came on for trial before the Honorable Eugene A. Creany…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Penstan Supply, Inc. v. HaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Slagter v. Thrifty Clean, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Slaseman v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mancini v. MorrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Murphy v. BrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Laurel National Bank v. Mutual Benefit InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Murphy v. BrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API