Legal Opinion

Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 8, 1972PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This is an appeal from the granting of a special exception under the zoning ordinances of the town of Torrington permitting the erection of a multifamily dwelling group.

There was conflicting evidence before the zoning board of appeals and the trial court could not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185. The appeal record discloses that there was competent and sufficient evidence before the board to justify the result reached. The trial court was correct in concluding that the plaintiffs failed to sustain the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Housatonic Terminal Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API