Hesterly v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS I, II, III AND VII OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT [DE # 53]
ALAN S. GOLD, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [DE # 53], filed by Defendant Royal Caribbean Cruises LTD. (“Royal Caribbean”) on November 20, 2006. Having reviewed the Motion [DE # 53], Response [DE # 57], and Reply. [DE # 63] I grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
I. Factual Background
The following facts from the Amended Complaint are assumed to be true for purposes of evaluating the Motion…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rita Patricia Keefe v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zarrella v. Pacific Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Mumford v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Smith v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Hung Kang Huang v. Carnival Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Ridley v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.