Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Tucker, Willingham & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 1925No. 16139PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit as warehousemen for alleged negligent injury to ninety-nine bales of cotton, caused by allowing the cotton to become wet, by reason of the overflow of the Chattahoochee river, and be thereby damaged to the amount of $1886.54; and also for the loss of five bales of cotton, worth $909.48. The petition contained' one count only, and was not demurred to. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for the lump sum of $417.89. A new trial was applied for by the defendants, and when this was overruled they brought the case to this court for review.

*406It'is patent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Chase v. KnabelWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Rowland v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Flint Explosive Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Union Bag & Paper Corp. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API