Rowland v. Gardner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Special ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the verdict is totally null and void for uncertainty and ambiguity and is contrary to law because it does not cover the issues made by the pleadings and the evidence; that, since the case was brought in two counts, first for the recovery for timber cut from the land of the plaintiff, based on the manufactured value of the lumber produced therefrom, and second, for damages based on a trespass to the realty caused by damaging the young trees remaining on the property and injury to growing crops, the verdict in a lump sum, not…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. Oliver & MorrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Jaques v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Gainesville & Dahlonega Electric Railway Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barrow v. Georgia Lightweight Aggregate Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Sims v. MajorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Davis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Story v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Porter v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.