People v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Defendant Walker and one Thelma Linnigan were charged by an information with the crime of robbery. Prom a judgment of conviction following jury verdicts finding them both guilty of robbery in the first degree, Walker alone appeals.
Three contentions are made: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment of conviction of robbery in the first degree; (2) that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury on larceny as a lesser and included offense; and (3) that the court erred in permitting the court reporter to read the instructions to the jury.
The only evidence offered on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. PerhabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dillon v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. AllisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. MassieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965