Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Charles McAdam Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States-for the Southern District of New York. Suit by the Chadeloid Chemical Company against the Charles McAdam Company. From an interlocutory decree, restraining defendant from infringing plaintiff’s patent, defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States-for the Southern District of New York. Suit by the Chadeloid Chemical Company against the Charles McAdam Company. From an interlocutory decree, restraining defendant from infringing plaintiff’s patent, defendant appeals. Appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 2, 1923, holding, inter alia, that plaintiff is the owner of United States letters patent, 1,014,211, dated January 9, 1912, to Dosselman & Neyman (hereinafter called Dosselman), and that claims' 7 and 8 of the…
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The record presents a rather curious situation. The complaint was in the usual form familiar in the ordinary patent infringement suit. Two patents were involved, but, at the opening of the trial, the controversy was narrowed to claims 7 and 8 of the Dosselman patent.
Plajntiff introduced in evidence a license agreement between plaintiff," as licensor, and Charles McAdam; as licensee, dated June 28, 1915. Under this agreement, the Dosselman patent was not specifically mentioned, but there was an all-gathering clause as to letters patent “now or hereafter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Eibel Process Co. v. Remington-Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Lathrop v. Rice & Adams CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Hazeltine Research Corp. v. Freed-Eisemann Radio Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1924