Legal Opinion

Consolidated Title Securities Co. v. Hopkins

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1934No. S. F. 14970PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Petition for writ of mandate. Petitioner, Consolidated Title Securities Compaq, leased a title searching plant owned by it to Security Title Insurance and Guarantee Company, a title insurance company with offices in the city of Los Angeles. The notice of personal property taxes served on petitioner on July 11, 1933, by respondent County Assessor of Los Angeles County charged petitioner with taxes in'the sum of $12,029.62, levied on office equipment, a law library and title searching plant, assessed respectively at $12,070, $750 and $270,230. Petitioner contends that said property is not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Southern California Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pullman Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Connecticut General Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Franklin Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Marsh & McLennan of California, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API