Legal Opinion

Adams v. Watkins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Hillsdale. (Lane, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

On March 1, 1887, plaintiffs conveyed to defendant certain farming lands for an expressed consideration of $3,600, and defendant went into possession. At the time of the conveyance, certain wheat was growing upon the' land. Plaintiffs insist that it was agreed by parol that, as a further consideration for the conveyance, ■defendant sho'uld harvest and market the wheat, and, after *432deducting the cost of threshing, pay to plaintiffs one-third of the proceeds; and this suit is brought to recover such one-third of the proceeds.

The court instructed the jury that, although a parol reservation of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vanderkarr v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schrimper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. DarnellWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Blough v. SteffensMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Grabow v. McCracken Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API