Legal Opinion

Shattuck v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1995No. 93-08632PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Chief Judge:

Kinetic Concepts, Inc. appeals an adverse judgment on a jury verdict in Bruce T. Shat-tuck’s age • discrimination suit. Shattuek cross appeals the grant of summary judgment dismissing his state law claims and the denial of front pay. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Background

In 1984 KCI, a marketer of medical products, hired Shattuek, then 52 years old, as a product manager. Shattuek invented a new device for KCI and thereafter was promoted to Director of National Account Sales. In that capacity he secured accounts with the majority of large hospital groups, winning…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Philip R. Visser v. Packer Engineering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Yellow Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Instruments Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Donna Patterson Nicholas Brown, and Michael L. Adams v. P.H.P. Healthcare Corporation Mark KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Russell v. Microdyne Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API