Legal Opinion

Fitts v. HANKS ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is an action to recover rent pursuant to the terms of a written lease, brought by Robert J. Fitts, as plaintiff, against James Hanks and Helen L. Hanks, as defendants. A verdict was returned and judgment entered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

On October 25,1950, defendants, as lessees, entered into a lease agreement with Herman Moritz and Myrtle Moritz, as lessors. The lease provides that lessees would rent for a term of four years certain real property which was a part of the Golden Gate Hop Ranch, located near Independence, in Polk county, Oregon, together with certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edmison v. LowrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Title & Trust Co. v. Durkheimer Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Wusthoff v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hotel Marion Co. v. WatersOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Johnston v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durfee House Furnishing Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Maki Et Ux v. NikulaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bates v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company v. Cedar Avenue, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API