Legal Opinion
Morrow v. Air Methods, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 11, 1995No. Civ. 4-92-1263PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages. Based on the file, record and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated below, the court grants defendant’s motion
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Greyson B. Morrow was employed by defendant Air Methods, Inc. in St. Paul, Minnesota, as a pilot from April 7,1985, until his discharge on May 24,1992. Morrow filed suit and asserted claims against Air Methods for illegal retaliation under Minnesota’s whistleblower statute, wrongful discharge in violation of public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eisert v. Greenberg Roofing & Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Vonch v. Carlson Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Cunningham v. Florida Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Boelter v. City of Coon RapidsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Kruszka v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.