Legal Opinion
Neary v. Frantz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 6, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6142PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of a special action brought by a teacher whose employment contract was not renewed. The pertinent facts giving rise to this litigation are as follows. Michael Neary was employed as a substitute teacher in the Wilson Elementary School District during the first semester of the 1977-78 school year. He had a substitute’s certificate which entitled him to teach as a non-contract teacher for not more than 90 days during a school year. See Ariz.Admin. Comp.R. 7-2-603(K) (1978). However, he had not completed the educational requirements…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nicolella v. Trinity Area School District School BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Marie Anne Brown v. Leonard J. Delayo, Individually and as Superintendent of Public InstructionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Comco Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Monroe v. Basis School, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. OneArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Hillhouse v. Rice School District No. 20Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Arizonans for Second Chances v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Atwood v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.