Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. One
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.
Plaintiff, Evangeline Wheeler, was hired as a probationary teacher by Yuma School District No. 1 (the “District”). Her contract was not renewed, inter alia, because of alleged “poor communication skills” with parents. We granted review to determine whether that charge was unrelated to classroom performance and therefore exempted the District from the requirement to give ninety days’ preliminary notice pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 15-536(B) and 15-538(A). The second issue we consider is whether the teacher’s hiring during the ninety-day period itself exempted the District…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Beilan v. Board of Public Ed., School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Horosko v. Mt. Pl't Twp. S. DistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Horosko v. Mount Pleasant Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Beebee v. Haslett Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Ford v. Showboat Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Roberts v. Santa Cruz Valley Unified School District No. 35Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001