Legal Opinion

Hillhouse v. Rice School District No. 20

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the granting of summary judgment in favor of appellee Rice School District on the issue of appellant Hillhouse’s status as a teacher. The trial court held, as a matter of law, that appellant did not satisfy the requirements of the Arizona Teachers Tenure Act, A.R.S. § 15-501, et seq. [the Act] and therefore was not a “continuing,” or tenured, teacher. We disagree.

Appellant Hillhouse became employed by appellee Rice School District in 1977, and remained an employee until her termination by the District in 1984. The District claims that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marston's Inc. v. Roman Catholic Church of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. BOARD OF EDUC., TUCSON HS DIST. NO. 1 v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Mish v. Tempe School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. Knollmiller v. WelchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API