Cinema Classics, Ltd. v. Busch
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
IRVING HILL, District Judge:
The Court heard argument on the said motion and has considered the various documents and affidavits filed in support of the motion and in opposition thereto, and has determined to grant Plaintiffs a preliminary injunction, the terms of which are specified hereinafter.
All findings of fact and conclusions of law herein made are made only on the basis of the facts as they now appear to us and without prejudice to the urging of contrary facts and legal conclusions at the trial of the case.
Plaintiffs are five…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Penthouse International, Ltd. v. McAuliffeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. SteskalIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- Penthouse International, Ltd. v. McAuliffeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1977
- Maguin v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.