Legal Opinion

Zeltser v. City of Oakland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 2003No. 01-17430PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Tamara Zeltser, d/b/a Medallion Jewelry & Loan (“Zeltser”), appeals the district *1143court’s order granting summary judgment to the City of Oakland (“City”) in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court held as a matter of law that the City did not violate Zeltser’s right to due process when it failed to provide her with notice and an opportunity to be heard before returning a ring seized from her pawnshop to its original owner. The district court held that because the ring was seized pursuant to a warrant under CaLPenal Code § 1536, no further notice and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jorita Padfield v. Aig Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Sanders v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. G & G Jewelry, Inc. v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Creative Paperclay Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Sasin v. County of KingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Zeltsar v. City Of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API