Legal Opinion

Sanders v. City of San Diego

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1996No. 95-55122PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

John Sanders (dba Golden Rule Pawn Brokerage) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of San Diego and Detective Mark Michel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988. Sanders contends that the warrantless seizure of allegedly stolen property from his pawn shop and the police de*1425partment’s return of stolen property to its owner violated Sanders’ right to procedural due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we AFFIRM in part and REVERSE and REMAND in part.

I

Linda Hardeman, a nurse’s aide employed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kendall Tucker v. Fulton County, IlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Walters v. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. PPS, Inc. v. Faulkner County, Ark.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Gem Fin. Serv., Inc. v. City of N.Y.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Mahnke v. GarriganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API