Creative Paperclay Co. v. Sentry Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Creative Paperclay Company, Inc. asserts that the district court erred in grant*861ing Sentry Insurance summary judgment and denying Creative Paperclay’s motion for an order specifying issues that exist without substantial controversy. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We review a district court’s decision to grant or deny summary judgment de novo. Zeltser v. City of Oakland, 325 F.3d 1141, 1143 (9th Cir.2003). Under California law, Creative Paperclay has the burden of establishing that the counterclaim in this case comes within the scope…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Zeltser v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003