Independent Bank v. Hammel Associates, LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.
We must decide whether the trial court abused its discretion under MCR 2.311(A) by denying defendants, K.A.M. Transport, Inc., M & Y Express, Inc., and Aly Mohamed Maarouf, an opportunity to have plaintiff, Karen Burris, submit to additional independent medical examinations (IMEs) when plaintiff had previously submitted to similar IMEs in another case involving the same alleged injuries. For the reasons articulated below, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendants’ motion to compel IMEs. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Thomas M Cooley Law School v. Doe 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kohut v. Lois & Richard Lewiston Living Trust (In re Lewiston)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Trevor Legassick v. University of Michigan RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019