Legal Opinion
Moss v. Crawford & Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 21, 2000No. 98-1350, 212PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAIAZZA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently before the court is the Motion to Decertify Class filed by the defendant Crawford & Company (Crawford) at document number two hundred and twelve. Before proceeding into the substance of Crawford’s motion, the court will briefly review the convoluted history of this lawsuit.
A. Procedural History
On August 12,1998, Plaintiff Chester Porter Moss initiated this lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover unpaid overtime compensation from Crawford for his work during the clean-up of the Ashland oil…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Phillip N. Lockhart, Charles B. Wilson, James Lowery, James P. Durham and Thomas Bradley v. Westinghouse Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Scott v. Aetna Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Rawls v. Augustine Home Health Care, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Johnson v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.