Legal Opinion
Scott v. Aetna Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 3, 2002No. Civ.A. No. 3:99 CV 46(CFD)PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTED RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS1
DRONEY, District Judge.
I. Background
The plaintiffs, Narain C. Scott, Christopher B. Sura, and Franz X. Buhagiar, and the class of individuals on whose behalf the plaintiffs seek to bring their claims, are employed by Aetna Services Inc. as “Systems Engineers” with “job codes” 504*14 and 504*16. Aetna classifies Systems Engineers with such job codes as exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (“FLSA”) and the Connecticut Minimum Wage Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 31-58, et seq. (“CMWA”), and thus, does…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Shelter Realty Corp. v. Allied Maintenance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Damassia v. Duane Reade, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Noble v. 93 University Place Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Brown v. Money Tree Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.