New York Society for the Suppression of Vice v. Macfadden Publications, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
The action is in libel. The complaint has been sustained by the Appellate Division. I am, therefore, bound by the decision of the Special Term, affirmed on appeal, that “ The whole intent of the article is defamatory and the statement is made several times that the society engineers cases in order to receive fifty per cent of the fines. The purport of the article is that the plaintiff engineers or brings about the commission of crime in order to profit financially from the fines imposed.” (N. Y. Soc. for Suppression of Vice v. MacFadden Pub., Inc., 129 Misc. 408, 415; affd., 222 App. Div.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bingham v. . GaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Mattice v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bingham v. GaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- McDonald v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Schieffelin v. HylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
- Klein v. BibenNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961