Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1961No. 35024Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 Wn.2d 549 (1961)

358 P.2d 792

ALBERT E. FARRAR, Respondent,

v.

TRIBUNE PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellant.[1]

No. 35024.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 19, 1961.

Carnahan, Gordon & Goodwin, for appellant.

Howard Carothers, for respondent.

FOSTER, J.

[1] The question for decision is whether we should overrule Ott v. Press Pub. Co., 40 Wash. 308, 82 Pac. 403 (1905). It was there held that, in an action for damages on account of a newspaper publication which was libelous per se, the defendant may, under the express provisions of RCW 4.36.130, plead and prove all of the mitigating…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Finley; Concurrence · Donworth.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Fleckenstein v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Spokane Truck & Dray Co. v. HoeferWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Madison v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API