Legal Opinion

Andrello v. Dulan

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Simons, J.

This is an action by the plaintiffs as Councilmen and taxpayers of the City of Utica, New York seeking a declaratory judgment determining that Ordinance No. 399 of the City of Utica passed July 10, 1965 is illegal and void, and requesting the issuance of an injunction restraining the defendants from purchasing the assets of the Utica Transit Corporation. The amended complaint also set forth a cause of *19action alleging waste of public property pursuant to section 22 of the Second Class Cities Law. During the course of trial, on motion of defendants, these allegations of waste and the testimony…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. The People Ex Rel. Murphy v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Cherey v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Spring Brook Water Co. v. Village of Hudson FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York State School Bus Operators Ass'n v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Tupper v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. TUPPER, JOSEPH v. CITY OF SYRACUSEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API