Legal Opinion

Spring Brook Water Co. v. Village of Hudson Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This is a submitted controversy upon agreed facts pursuant to the provisions of sections 546-548 of the Civil Practice Act. Plaintiff is a domestic corporation and defendant a municipal corporation.

On November 1, 1943, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing by the terms of which plaintiff agreed to sell to defendant its water system in the village of Hudson Falls, N. Y., and defendant agreed to purchase the same. The contract contains a condition that it is subject to the consent, approval or authorization of any regulatory agency which may have jurisdiction in the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Andrello v. DulanNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. New York City Housing Authority v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Board of Railroad CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. New York Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API