Legal Opinion

Mineral Policy Center v. Norton

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 2003No. CIV.A.01-00073(HHK)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KENNEDY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mineral Policy Center, Great Basin Mine Watch, and Guardians of the Rural Environment, 1 bring this action to challenge the revision of federal mining regulations promulgated by defendant, Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), United States Department of the Interior (“Interior”), on October 30, 2001. 2 According to plaintiffs, the regulations, codified at 43 C.F.R. § 3809 (2003) (“2001 Regulations”) “substantially weaken, and in many instances eliminate, BLM’s authority to protect the public’s lands, waters, cultural and religious sites, and…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Hammond v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Humane Soc. of US v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Martin County, Florida v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Shays v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API