Denham v. D.J.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Bryan Denham, an Assistant Bur-leigh County State’s Attorney, appeals from a juvenile court order adopting a judicial referee’s decision that D.J. is not required to register as a sexual offender. We conclude a juvenile court may order the preparation of a report or evaluation to address requirements for registration as a sexual offender and may require production of the report or evaluation to make *335findings on the requirements for registration. Because a court-ordered evaluation was not provided to the juvenile court in this case and the court did not make required…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Turner v. R.W.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Cruff v. A.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- B.D.H. ex rel. S.K.L. v. MickelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- B.D.H. v. MickelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by3 opinions
- Interest of M.H.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Weeks v. GeiermannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Interest of K.I.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025