Legal Opinion

Denham v. D.J.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2011No. 20100403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bryan Denham, an Assistant Bur-leigh County State’s Attorney, appeals from a juvenile court order adopting a judicial referee’s decision that D.J. is not required to register as a sexual offender. We conclude a juvenile court may order the preparation of a report or evaluation to address requirements for registration as a sexual offender and may require production of the report or evaluation to make *335findings on the requirements for registration. Because a court-ordered evaluation was not provided to the juvenile court in this case and the court did not make required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. R.W.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cruff v. A.R.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. B.D.H. ex rel. S.K.L. v. MickelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. B.D.H. v. MickelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Interest of M.H.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Weeks v. GeiermannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Interest of K.I.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API