Legal Opinion

B.D.H. ex rel. S.K.L. v. Mickelson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2010No. 20100152PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] B.D.H., by and through his parents, next of friends and natural legal guardians, S.K.L. and C.S.H., and S.K.L. and C.S.H., individually, (“plaintiffs”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their malpractice action against Dr. Margaret Mickelson, Dr. Nathaniel Karlins, MeritCare Health System, and MeritCare Hospital (“doctors”). The plaintiffs argue B.D.H.’s wrongful life claim, which they define as an action by a child who claims he or she was born with impairments and would not have been born but for a doctor’s negligent advice or treatment of the child’s mother,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wheeler v. GardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. TIBERT v. SlominskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Smith v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KleppeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kost v. KraftNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Loper v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hughes v. Olheiser MasonryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Weeks v. GeiermannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API