Legal Opinion

Halsan v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The plaintiff, Wallace Halsan, a minor, by S. J. Halsan, guardian ad litem, instituted this action against the defendant, Marie Johnson, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between his sled and a truck owned by the defendant. From the order of the circuit court setting aside the judgment entered upon the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant this appeal is taken.

The facts are substantially as follows: On January 20,1935, Wallace Halsan, aged thirteen years, five and one-half months, while coasting on a sled down hill on Tenth street in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Davidson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Speight v. SimonsenOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilson v. BittnerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Turley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. Loose v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lunski v. LindemannOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Duty v. East Coast Tender Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. William H. Duty, Jr., and Raymond International, Inc. And Peter Kiewitt Sons Company and Tidewater Construction Corporation, a Joint Venture D/B/A Raymond-Kiewitt-Tidewater, Intervening v. East Coast Tender Service, Inc., William H. Duty, Jr., and Raymond International, Inc. And Peter Kiewitt Sons Company and Tidewater Construction Corporation, a Joint Venture D/B/A Raymond-Kiewitt-Tidewater v. East Coast Tender Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API