Legal Opinion
Etelson v. Suburban Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 11, 1971No. [No. 52, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
The appellants, Jerome A. and Marilyn F. Etelson, contest a decision of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Levine, J.) awarding a judgment in the amount of $2,455.07 against them, as the endorsers of a promissory note, and in favor of the appellee, Suburban Trust Company (Bank).
On July 31, 1969, the Bank made a loan to the J. M. Kalista Company, Inc., a Maryland corporation. Mr. Etelson, as the President of the Kalista Company, executed on behalf of the corporation a promissory note payable to the order of the Bank in the amount of $2,400.00. As security for this transaction the Bank…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaffer v. DavidsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Rose v. HomseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Nebraska State Bank v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Highland Investment Co. v. Kansas City Computing Scales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Universal Metals & MacHinery, Inc. v. BohartTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Connecticut National Bank v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bank of Crockett v. CullipherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- White v. Household Finance CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- American Bank of Commerce v. CovoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.