Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 14, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal from Scott Circuit Court in Chancery. Bdgar B. Bryant, Judge. Action by the State for the use of the sixteenth section school fund against J. O. A. Sullivan. The facts .are stated in the opinion. 1. The failure of the treasurer to file his mortgage for record released the surety. 34 Ark. 80.
1Opinion of the CourtBaTTeE, J.
According to the abstract of appellant, which is not controverted by the appellee, the facts ;in this case are, in part, as follows:
“On the 9th of January, 1885, H. E). Collum executed his note to T. M. E)vart, treasurer of Scott county, for the sum of one hundred dollars, payable one year after date, with 10 per cent, interest, with J. O. A. Sullivan as his surety. The money for which the note was given was part of the sixteenth section school fund, and was loaned as directed by section 6288 of Mansfield’s Digest. On the same day (January 9th, 1885), and at the same time, Collum, in order to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burr v. BoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
- Grisard v. HinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Hubbard v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- D. W. Jaquays & Co. v. First Security BankArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Etelson v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- First National Bank in Grand Forks v. Haugen Ford, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- H. Max Ammerman v. Lou MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.