Legal Opinion

Nebraska State Bank v. May

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1928No. 26012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

In this action the plaintiff, appellant, sought recovery on two promissory notes, signed by defendants, appellees, apparently as makers. The petition was in usual form. Default was entered as to defendant May, and defendant Haack interposed the defense that he was but a surety on the notes, and that by reason of certain stated obligations resting on the plaintiff, payee, by it uncomplied with (such as procuring to be filed in the proper counties certain chattel mortgages), he as such surety had been released. To this answer plaintiff interposed a general denial, followed by a plea of facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. Morton-Gregson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Norton v. Bankers Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Langeveld v. L. R. Z. H. Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Etelson v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Ring v. DueyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. NJ BK. & TR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Behle v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API