State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county. Rice, J., entered January 23, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in contempt proceedings, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.
1Opinion
On Rehearing En Banc.
[Decided February 19, 1910.]
Chadwick, J.
In the main case, decided July 26, 1909, we held the defendant boom company, J. W. Kleeb, John F. *12Hobi and W. H. Abel for the civil damages resulting to the appellant from the continued use of appellant’s boom ground, pending ineffectual attempts to carry the original controversy between the Nicomen Boom Company and the North Shore Boom & Driving Company to the supreme court of the' United States. Mr. Abel is a stockholder in the North Shore Company. He was not an officer, but with other attorneys advised respondent company that it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. ComptonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Hawley v. BennettNew York Court of Chancery · 1833
- Emerson v. HussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Farmer v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.